The first concept I would like to touch on is the idea of the minstrel show. According to Benshoff and Griffin in America on Film a minstrel show is "a type of musical comedy variety show that featured white actors impersonating blacks" (p. 79). This was a term I had heard of in the past, as part of a musical number in White Christmas, but never knew what it was or the significance behind it until after I read it the other day. The following clip is the minstrel show number from White Christmas.
This clip is very interesting as it seeks to impersonate the minstrel show in which characters would dress up in blackface and tell jokes. However, if you watched the clip, you would notice none of the actors or actresses did that. I think this has something to do with the post World War II ideologies about race that were starting to show up in film around the time White Christmas was made. There are a few things I did notice, though, that seemed to tell the story of the minstrel show. For instance the lead characters of the number were wearing black clothes. I'm thinking maybe the justification for this was to show the premise behind the minstrel show without having to outright offend any racial groups. Also Mr. Bones was mentioned in the song they were singing in the clip. It seemed significant so I did a Google search and found several sites that talked about a tambourine man and a bone man that were generally included in minstrel shows. If you watched the clip, you would also have noticed the tambourines too. Toward the end of the clip you can get a good look at them and they are red with faces on them. Again, it seems they are trying to capture the premise behind the minstrel show while still being politically correct.
The next topic I would like to touch on is that of Jewish actors in Hollywood. Since I am talking about the movie White Christmas, it seems odd that I would be thinking Jewish actors who do not celebrate Christmas. However, according to Benshoff and Griffin, "Jewish actors were encouraged to change their names to 'whiter-sounding' ones" (p. 67). One of the actors Benshoff and Griffin mention is David Kaminsky, better known as Danny Kaye, who was one of the nice young fellows dressed up as Santa Claus in the clip below.
Now I understand that in Hollywood actors and actresses often need to "act" the part of someone else, but to me this seems like a major breech of character. Not only did Kaminsky give up his name to better fit the Hollywood model, but apparently he had to give up his religion too. I guess in those days if you wanted to make it, you needed to make sacrifices, including dressing up as Santa Claus in a movie called White Christmas.
The last issue I would like to talk about is the "whiteness" of White Christmas. Benshoff and Griffin talk about the "whiteness" of Hollywood in which films are often shown from the white patriarchal standpoint. White Christmas is no exception. In fact, it is such a white film, there is only one visible character of any race besides white. Below is a clip from White Christmas where the one token black character is seen as a server on a train.
I sat down and re-watched this movie just to prove the whiteness of it when I stumbled along this one nonwhite character. I probably would never have even noticed him in this scene had I not been looking specifically for him, but now that I did see him I realized he was put there for a reason. There were hundreds of extras in this movie in restaurant scenes and dancers, yet this was the only person who resembled anything close to a nonwhite actor or actress. That lead me to believe they put him there to prove a point: they were including nonwhite actors into their film. Had they just stuck him in the background of a restaurant he would never have been noticed. But since he was a very visible, although nonspeaking, character, if only for a few seconds, they could make that claim.
It seems every good movie has a few flaws, especially some of the classics of yesterday. That won't keep me from watching them and enjoying them for their entertainment value. However, I do find myself watching these movies with a more critical eye these days to find the true meaning of what the film is trying to say.
You are one fucked up person!!
ReplyDeleteWho cares if it has all white people? How many white people are in Spike Lee movies? Not many, yet nobody cares. We need to stop caring about color. Political correctness holds back everybody, including minorities.
ReplyDeleteYou're missing the point. Look a bit closer.
DeleteI agree we need to stop caring about color. The problem is that people DO. So let the writer talk about it!
DeleteI had a similar query about White Christmas, they are replicating a minstrel show routine that did not include much or any blackface. The show was once done by George H Primrose (who is mentioned in the song). Primrose started out doing blackface but started doing primarily 'whiteface' instead while keeping the rest of a vaudeville shows characteristics. His troupe became very popular and eventually redefined popular minstrel shows as a 'whiteface' routine rather than a blackface routine. Good end result I guesse, but not necessarily a good man to idolize or miss. It's weird examining things you grew up on, I realized I'm so white, it hurts a little.
ReplyDeleteThe information about George Primrose is correct. However, the Mandy number was performed in This Is The Army in blackface by white soldiers. The words and music were by Irving Berlin, who actually sang in the movie. Ronald Reagan, Kate Smith, Alan Hale-- quite a few big names, and it predates White Christmas by only a decade or so.
DeleteI appreciate your thoughtful insight and reflection.
ReplyDeleteI always considered it vaudeville ratherthan minstrel since it left out the racist elements. Taken at face value it's a cheeky, delightful song based around word play, dad jokes, and assorted things popular in the 40s to early 50s. The one black character seemed to be treated with respect when they interacted briefly with him. I saw how they admired how well he mixed drinks. A bartender may not wind up with a speaking role, but it is a job of skill and he did it with class. All things considered this movie was quite fair for its day. Was it all inclusive and diverse? No. It was a movie done in the early 50s set in the early 50s. The fact that it didn't have the man act like a slow witted caricature is remarkable since that was far more common in the old shows and movies. As a result I am able to enjoy the movie on its own merits and consider it a period piece. There are far worse movies than this one.
ReplyDeleteI guess you are too young to know that the porters, lunch counter and even cooks in the Pullman cars on American passenger trains were african americans. Even though they were in the typical post civil rights era role of serving people of higher society, it was one of the few good paying jobs available to them at that time. But it wasnt all fun and games for them either. They still faced racism and discrimination on the trains.
ReplyDeleteDamn. Typo. Should be pre civil right era
DeleteIts pointless to compare movie of old to today. View them in the historical and political and societal context when they were made.
ReplyDeleteI would like to clear up some of the confusion over "The Minstrel Show" number in "White Christmas." Georgie Primrose is sometimes remembered as the originator of "soft shoe" dance. He straddled the line between the minstrel show era and the vaudeville era. The musical number in the movie was meant to be an ode to those two eras of entertainment in America. Thus, all the callbacks to those shows (bad jokes, the references to Georgie Primrose & Mr. Bones, the dance moves, tambourines, the costumes,etc.) were meant to be nostalgic, even if we can read more into it today.
ReplyDeleteLana, you have too much time on your hands. Wasted 5 minutes of my life just now reading this...sorry
ReplyDeleteContrary to your beliefs many Jewish folks celebrated Christmas with their Christian friends, (they all aren't orthodox) and the country was also 93% WHITE in 1954, virtue signaling esp about times you couldn't possibly understand unless you lived through them at the time is actually uglier than any of the perceived racism you are hung up on. Some day 65 yeas from now someone is going to stumble upon your blog and critizes you for doing something you may not think is wrong now, but to a SJW in 2084 YOU will be subject of bashing. What comes around goes around, arm chair quarterbacks are so boorish. 😲
ReplyDelete